[Kim-discussion] Issue with getEntites method in CoreDBApi
borislav popov
borislav.popov at ontotext.com
Wed Aug 5 09:02:04 EDT 2009
Thanks Alistair,
Philip and Danko will analyze this and come back to you
cheers
borislav
On Aug 5, 2009, at 2:55 PM, <alistair.duke at bt.com> wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I've found some strange behaviour when using the getEntities method
> of the CoreDbApi. If I use the
>
> ResultSetIterator getEntities(Set docIds)
>
> form it works fine i.e. I just get the entities in the documents
> defined in the set. However, if I use the
>
> ResultSetIterator getEntities(Set docIds, CoreDbQuery query)
> form, it only seems to look at the query restrictions and ignores
> the docid restrictions. This means I get all entites regardless of
> whether they are in the specified documents or not.
>
> I'm using KIM 2.5. Is this something you've come across?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alistair
>
> Alistair Duke
> Next Generation Web Research
> Centre for Information & Security Systems Research
> BT Innovate & Design
> ___________________________
> Office: +44(0) 1473 608192
> Mobile: +44(0) 7730 426257
> Fax : +44(0) 1473 606755
> Email: alistair.duke at bt.com
> This email contains BT information, which may be privileged or
> confidential.
> It's meant only for the individual(s) or entity named above. If
> you're not the intended
> recipient, note that disclosing, copying, distributing or using this
> information
> is prohibited. If you've received this email in error, please let me
> know immediately
> on the email address above. Thank you.
> We monitor our email system, and may record your emails.
> British Telecommunications plc
> Registered office: 81 Newgate Street London EC1A 7AJ
> Registered in England no: 1800000
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kim-discussion mailing list
> Kim-discussion at ontotext.com
> http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ontotext.com/pipermail/kim-discussion/attachments/20090805/13b06fb4/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Kim-discussion
mailing list