[Kim-discussion] index format of annotated doc

[Marin Nozhchev]

  Hi Fangkai,

Borislav explained that you can (and should!) modify the index behind 
the KIM Server using the KIM Server API. We will upload the first 
documentation draft tomorrow where there is a developer's guide.

If you want to know what is the binary format of the indexes, it is also 
simple to explain. The index has two parts - a BigOWLIM RDF triple 
repository located in context/default/populated and an Apache Lucene 
index of all imported documents stored in 
context/default/populated/index-and-store.

Best,
Marin

On 14.07.2010 12:11 ч., borislav popov wrote:
> Hi Fangkai,
> until someone more knowledgeable shares his thoughts, take this:
> - reading the index: this is a basic operation behind every search - 
> so yes.
> - modify - yes on the granularity of documents, entities and 
> annotations. deeper manipulations of non-atomic artifacts are likely 
> to cause inconsistencies.
>
> - format: as we provide multiple types of search, there are different 
> aspects to the index. On one hand you can have a traditional (still 
> altered) FTS index based on Lucene or MG4J; On the other the entire 
> semantic repository with the loaded ontologies and knowledge bases 
> serves as an index. The correspondence between documents, annotations 
> and ontology entities is also an index.
>
> let us know more what you need to do and maybe we'll be able to help
>
> borislav
>
>
> On Jul 13, 2010, at 7:35 PM, Yang Fangkai wrote:
>
>> Hello, List,
>>
>> I am wondering if there is anyway to manipulate the index of
>> the annotated document (for example, read, or modify)? What is the
>> format of the indexes and where are they stored? Thank you!
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Fangkai
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kim-discussion mailing list
>> Kim-discussion at ontotext.com
>> http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kim-discussion mailing list
> Kim-discussion at ontotext.com
> http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion