[Kim-discussion] runtime error as KIM Server is starting

Marin Nozhchev mnozchev at sirma.bg
Fri Jul 16 08:20:27 EDT 2010


  Hi Chris,

You only need to add a stage to your GATE pipeline that imports new 
named entities with their canonical name into the KIM Semantic 
Repository . That can be achieved using the Java RMI API of the KIM 
Server. Does that work for your usecase ?

I'll send the relevant links after we release the full documentation.

Best,
Marin

On 14.07.2010 18:09 ч., Chris Baker wrote:
> Hi Marin,
> If I understand this correctly our knowledgebase must be instantiated 
> with
> canonical names of all instances that could possibly exist for our 
> domain model.
> In our scenario we instantiate canonical names only when they are 
> found in the
> corpus by text mining. So this is not intuitive to us.
> Can you elaborate.
> Chris
>
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Chris Baker <denguehost at gmail.com 
> <mailto:denguehost at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Marin,
>     Does this mean that we have to create Alias classes into our
>     own ontology and then map our alias class with ProtonS Alias class ?
>     Should our Alias class be a subclass of Proton Alias class.
>     Should we use  SameAs or Subclass
>     I am also concerened that all out synonyms in our gazateer
>     now need to be represented in our ontology. Bascially an RDF
>     gazeteer. Is this correct ?
>     Chris and Alex
>     On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Marin Nozhchev
>     <marin.nozhchev at ontotext.com <mailto:marin.nozhchev at ontotext.com>>
>     wrote:
>
>          Hi Alex,
>
>         The alias definitions and the individual declaration must be
>         in the same place. In this case, everything should go in your
>         test ontology. There should be no reason to edit any of the
>         PROTON files.
>
>         I'm sorry if the documentation confused you to think that the
>         links between entities and aliases and the aliases should be
>         added to PROTON System. I CC'ed one of our editor, who will
>         review the relevant text*
>
>         Hope this helps,
>         Marin
>
>         *
>         http://nmwiki.ontotext.com/nmwiki/pmwiki.php/KimDocs-30-EN/ExtendInformationExtraction
>
>
>
>         On 14.07.2010 17:23 ч., alexk at unb.ca <mailto:alexk at unb.ca> wrote:
>
>             Hi Marin,
>
>             Let' say I have individual indA_1 of the class A. This
>             individual is included in my test ontology.
>
>             Now I am trying to follow your documentation and have
>             create individual indA_1a of the class Allias. This
>             individual is added to the Protons ontology. My
>             unserstanding is that I have connect
>             indA_1:hasAlias:indA_1a
>
>             The problem is hasAlias:indA_1a belongs to Protons while
>              indA_1 belongs to our test ontology.
>
>             The ontologies are not connect by import (only by mapping
>             file).
>
>             So, where I have to place the statement like
>              indA_1:hasAlias:indA_1a   ?
>
>
>             Thank you
>
>             Alex
>
>
>
>
>
>             Quoting Marin Nozhchev <marin.nozhchev at ontotext.com
>             <mailto:marin.nozhchev at ontotext.com>>:
>
>                  Hi Alex,
>
>                 In the Ontology screen, the line:  "A, a List, a
>                 Restriction" means that A is class of type (owl:)List
>                 and (owl:)Restriction. Thus clicking on the
>                 Restriction, thus shows the known metadata about
>                 owl:Restriction.
>
>                 The KIM UI doesn't show what restrictions apply to
>                 class A.
>
>                 Did I understand you correctly?
>
>                 Best,
>                 Marin
>
>                 On 13.07.2010 17:47 ч., alexk at unb.ca
>                 <mailto:alexk at unb.ca> wrote:
>
>                     Yes, it seems to work now. Thank you.
>
>                     Only concern I have at the moment is that I click
>                     on restrictions for class A or B (Ontology screen)
>                     I got a list of data properties that are not in my
>                     Ontology. May be they are inherited? Is it what
>                     expected to be?
>
>
>                     My next step will be to populate it with instances
>                     and try searching.
>
>
>                     Quoting Marin Nozhchev
>                     <marin.nozhchev at ontotext.com
>                     <mailto:marin.nozhchev at ontotext.com>>:
>
>                         I tested that visibility file and it is
>                         correct. Please tell me if any other issues
>                         remain after applying the patch.
>
>                         Best,
>                         Marin
>
>                         On 13.07.2010 17:20 ч., alexk at unb.ca
>                         <mailto:alexk at unb.ca> wrote:
>
>                             visibility file attached...
>
>
>                             Quoting Marin Nozhchev
>                             <marin.nozhchev at ontotext.com
>                             <mailto:marin.nozhchev at ontotext.com>>:
>
>                                 Hi Alex, all,
>
>                                 The attached patch that updates KIM
>                                 Platform 3.0-RC3 to 3.0-RC4. Unzip it
>                                 in the KIM installation folder, while
>                                 the KIM Server and Apache Tomcat (or
>                                 other servlet container that you are
>                                 using) are stopped.
>
>                                 I have tested that your test ontology
>                                 loads and displays correctly after
>                                 patching. You don't need to reset KIM
>                                 by deleting populated after patching.
>
>                                 Best,
>                                 Marin
>
>                                 P.S. Matt, 3.0-RC4 will be available
>                                 on the ontotext.com/kim
>                                 <http://ontotext.com/kim> later today.
>                                 On 12.07.2010 18:32 ч., Marin Nozhchev
>                                 wrote:
>
>                                     Hi Alex, All,
>
>                                     Thank you for reporting the issue.
>                                     It looks like this is an issue in
>                                     KIM, which fails to account for
>                                     RDF blank nodes that appear as a
>                                     result of OWL inference over some
>                                     ontologies.
>
>                                     This issue was aggravated by a
>                                     recent change in BigOWLIM. We will
>                                     fix that immediately, as other
>                                     users may experience that too.
>                                     I'll send you a patch tomorrow and
>                                     the team will put a new release
>                                     candidate with the patch for download.
>
>                                     Best,
>                                     Marin
>
>                                     On 12.07.2010 18:06 ч.,
>                                     alexk at unb.ca <mailto:alexk at unb.ca>
>                                     wrote:
>
>
>                                         Hi Marin,
>
>                                         We tried to integrate our
>                                         ontology with Kim. (It is
>                                         about small test ontology,
>                                         just to learn how to do it).
>                                         We got a Java runtime error as
>                                         KIM Server is starting (please
>                                         see the error message in the
>                                         attachment). The ontology,
>                                         mapping and configuration are
>                                         also attached. Would you have
>                                         a minute to take a look on it?
>
>                                         Any suggestions?
>
>                                         Thank you
>
>                                         Alex
>
>
>                                         Alexandre Kouznetsov, PHD
>                                         postdoctoral research scientist
>                                         Knowledge Navigation
>                                         Infrastructure Team
>                                         Dept. Computer Science &
>                                         Applied Statistics
>                                         University of New Brunswick,
>                                         Canada
>
>                                         tel: 506 6399358
>                                         emails: akouz086 at uottawa.ca
>                                         <mailto:akouz086 at uottawa.ca> ,
>                                         alexk at unb.ca <mailto:alexk at unb.ca>
>
>                                         http://www.unbsj.ca/sase/csas/facultyPage.php?member=Dr.%20Alex%20Kouznetsov
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     -- 
>     Christopher J. O. Baker Ph. D.
>     Associate Professor
>     Dept. Computer Science and Applied Statistics
>     University of New Brunswick, Canada
>     http://ca.linkedin.com/in/christopherjobaker
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Christopher J. O. Baker Ph. D.
> Associate Professor
> Dept. Computer Science and Applied Statistics
> University of New Brunswick, Canada
> http://ca.linkedin.com/in/christopherjobaker

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ontotext.com/pipermail/kim-discussion/attachments/20100716/26d40e56/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Kim-discussion mailing list