[Kim-discussion] index format of annotated doc

[Fangkai Yang]

Hello, Marin,

          Could you give me a URL that I can take a look about the API
that access the indexes? I didn't find much from the website.

Thank you!

Fangkai

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 5:56 AM, Marin Nozhchev <mnozchev at sirma.bg> wrote:
>  Hi Fangkai,
>
> Borislav explained that you can (and should!) modify the index behind the
> KIM Server using the KIM Server API. We will upload the first documentation
> draft tomorrow where there is a developer's guide.
>
> If you want to know what is the binary format of the indexes, it is also
> simple to explain. The index has two parts - a BigOWLIM RDF triple
> repository located in context/default/populated and an Apache Lucene index
> of all imported documents stored in
> context/default/populated/index-and-store.
>
> Best,
> Marin
>
> On 14.07.2010 12:11 ч., borislav popov wrote:
>>
>> Hi Fangkai,
>> until someone more knowledgeable shares his thoughts, take this:
>> - reading the index: this is a basic operation behind every search - so
>> yes.
>> - modify - yes on the granularity of documents, entities and annotations.
>> deeper manipulations of non-atomic artifacts are likely to cause
>> inconsistencies.
>>
>> - format: as we provide multiple types of search, there are different
>> aspects to the index. On one hand you can have a traditional (still altered)
>> FTS index based on Lucene or MG4J; On the other the entire semantic
>> repository with the loaded ontologies and knowledge bases serves as an
>> index. The correspondence between documents, annotations and ontology
>> entities is also an index.
>>
>> let us know more what you need to do and maybe we'll be able to help
>>
>> borislav
>>
>>
>> On Jul 13, 2010, at 7:35 PM, Yang Fangkai wrote:
>>
>>> Hello, List,
>>>
>>> I am wondering if there is anyway to manipulate the index of
>>> the annotated document (for example, read, or modify)? What is the
>>> format of the indexes and where are they stored? Thank you!
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Fangkai
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Kim-discussion mailing list
>>> Kim-discussion at ontotext.com
>>> http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kim-discussion mailing list
>> Kim-discussion at ontotext.com
>> http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kim-discussion mailing list
> Kim-discussion at ontotext.com
> http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion
>