From borislav at sirma.bg Mon Oct 3 06:58:37 2011 From: borislav at sirma.bg (borislav popov) Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 13:58:37 +0300 Subject: [Kim-discussion] UTF-8 problem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Tran Ngoc Duc, i'm passing your request to our free support mail list. The colleagues will help you. all the best borislav On Oct 3, 2011, at 1:46 PM, Tran Ngoc Duc wrote: > Hi, > > I'm newbie with KIM. I save PROTON ontology file with UTF-8 format then start KIM server but it doesn't load this file. > I need KIM work with some UFT-8 file format in my language (VietNamese). How can it do that? Please give me an advise. > > Many thanks, From reneta.popova at ontotext.com Tue Oct 4 08:54:37 2011 From: reneta.popova at ontotext.com (Reneta Popova) Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 15:54:37 +0300 Subject: [Kim-discussion] EARLY BIRD REGISTRATION NOW OPEN: Semantic Technologies with OWLIM - 23-25 Nov, London Message-ID: Dear Ontotext friends, Early bird registration is now open for the next training course Semantic Technologies with OWLIM, which will take place on 23-25th November in Central London. This Ontotext training course is the second of its kind, and is especially designed for those new to semantic technology, as well as for those familiar with OWLIM to expand their knowledge. Corporate users of OWLIM will be able to use the event to train their employees, including IT managers, developers and operational staff. Semantic Technologies with OWLIM spans three days and focuses on: the basic principles of semantic technology, W3C standards (RDF, OWL, SPARQL), knowledge representation, reasoning and linked data building applications based on OWLIM, including advanced features such as owl:sameAs optimisation, geo-spatial and full-text search indexing supporting applications based on OWLIM, including cluster configuration and maintenance. Participants will be able to select only those days suitable for their level of experience. The trainers have many years of experience in teaching semantic technology and involvement in landmark deployments of RDF database engines, like the one for BBC's World Cup website, and in outstanding linked data projects like LinkedBrainz. Early bird registration is offered until the 20th of October at a 15% discount off the regular price (25% for students and partners). Normal registration finishes on the 10th of November - late registrations after this date incur a 30% surcharge (only 20% surcharge for students and partners). The maximum number of attendants is 12, so registrations will be given out on first-come-first-served basis. Full details are available from the Ontotext website. The Ontotext team -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: tbg.jpg Type: image/jpg Size: 2744 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: top.jpg Type: image/jpg Size: 7283 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: bottom.jpg Type: image/jpg Size: 18308 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: bbg.jpg Type: image/jpg Size: 2785 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: bg_pattern.jpg Type: image/jpg Size: 8416 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: lbg.jpg Type: image/jpg Size: 1330 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: rbg.jpg Type: image/jpg Size: 1319 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: letter_bg.jpg Type: image/jpg Size: 1381 bytes Desc: not available URL: From philip.alexiev at ontotext.com Tue Oct 4 09:43:47 2011 From: philip.alexiev at ontotext.com (philip.alexiev at ontotext.com) Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 09:43:47 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Kim-discussion] UTF-8 problem Message-ID: Hi Tran Ngoc Duc, Loading an ontology in UTF-8 should not be a problem. Can you provide the file that causes the problem. Thank you, Philip Alexiev Software Engineer, KIM team > > >Hi, > >I'm newbie with KIM. I save PROTON ontology file with UTF-8 format then start KIM server but it doesn't load this file. >I need KIM work with some UFT-8 file format in my language (VietNamese). How can it do that? >Please give me an advise. > >Many thanks, From philip.alexiev at ontotext.com Wed Oct 5 04:39:15 2011 From: philip.alexiev at ontotext.com (Philip Alexiev) Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 11:39:15 +0300 Subject: [Kim-discussion] UTF-8 problem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4E8C17B3.3050904@ontotext.com> Hi Tran Ngoc Duc, The problem is actually caused by the format of the file. Seems like Java does not handle well UTF-8 with BOM. I am providing a reference to a thread in the Sesame forum (Sesame is the RDF framework we use). The bottom post describes the problem: http://www.openrdf.org/forum/mvnforum/viewthread?thread=86 When I changed the encoding to standard UTF-8 without BOM it loaded OK. All the best, Philip On 5-10-2011 7:03 AM, Tran Ngoc Duc wrote: > Hi Philip Alexiev, > > The attached file is in the UFT-8 (with BOM) format. I have tried to > change "Astract" class label to VietNamese languge. > When i restart KIM server, it can't work with that file. > > Thanks, > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:43 PM, > wrote: > > Hi Tran Ngoc Duc, > > Loading an ontology in UTF-8 should not be a problem. > > Can you provide the file that causes the problem. > > Thank you, > Philip Alexiev > Software Engineer, KIM team > > > > > > >Hi, > > > >I'm newbie with KIM. I save PROTON ontology file with UTF-8 > format then > start KIM server but it doesn't load this file. > >I need KIM work with some UFT-8 file format in my language > (VietNamese). > How can it do that? > >Please give me an advise. > > > >Many thanks, > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From congnh0902 at gmail.com Thu Oct 6 04:07:50 2011 From: congnh0902 at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?SG/DoG5nIEPDtG5nIE5ndXnhu4Vu?=) Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:07:50 +0700 Subject: [Kim-discussion] Fwd: Help - Adding to document repository, importing new instances got from annotations into KB using Java API. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, I'm using KIM platform 3.0-RC-4 and i've got some problems, please help me solving them: 1) I create new document, add to document repository DocumentRepositoryAPI apiDocs = kimService.getDocumentRepositoryAPI(); CorporaAPI apiCorpora = kimService.getCorporaAPI(); String content = DocumentResource.TEST_URL_01; KIMDocument doc = apiCorpora.createDocument(content, true); doc=apiSemnAnn.execute(doc); apiDocs.addDocument(doc); but when i browse web ui, i can't see this document and i must restart KIM to take effect. Is there any way adding new document to repository without restarting or it is the same problem with deleting document in http://www.mail-archive.com/kim-discussion at ontotext.com/msg00696.html? 2) In documentation, to import new instances into KB, i must create new file (nt..) , import it to owlim and restart to take effect. So with new instances got from annotated documents, is there another way to import them into KB using java API. 3) When i add my own ontology to KIM, there may be some properties which are the same as properties in PROTON, how i should do with them? Mapping it to PROTON's properties using rdfs:subPropertyOf or using only my properties or using only PROTON's properties... Regards. Cong -- Cong Hoang Nguyen University: Hanoi University of Techonology and Science. Email: congnh0902 at gmail.com Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/monday0rsunday YH: congnh0902 Skype: monday0rsunday Phone: (+84)1678565200 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From philip.alexiev at ontotext.com Thu Oct 6 05:29:42 2011 From: philip.alexiev at ontotext.com (Philip Alexiev) Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 12:29:42 +0300 Subject: [Kim-discussion] Fwd: Help - Adding to document repository, importing new instances got from annotations into KB using Java API. References: Message-ID: <9BA0489A-A387-4CE5-8B9F-BBF1E38C18FB@ontotext.com> Begin forwarded message: > From: Philip Alexiev > Subject: Re: [Kim-discussion] Help - Adding to document repository, importing new instances got from annotations into KB using Java API. > Date: 6 October 2011 12:26:11 PM GMT+03:00 > To: Ho?ng C?ng Nguy?n > Cc: KIM discussion > > Hello Ho?ng C?ng Nguy?n, > > I will answer the questions in order: > > 1) Adding the document through the DocumentRepositoryAPI is sufficient to be able to see it in the UI. Making a search for documents will show it. > > 2) New entities, found in documents, are automatically added to the semantic repository. They are assigned a label and a type. Also the relation is created, that this document mentions that entity. Adding them manually is not necessary. > > 3) The answer to this question is more a matter of style. You might want to keep your ontology as a separate, complete module, so using the properties from another ontology module might not be a good idea. You can relate the properties, by making them subproperties of PROTON's equivalents. In fact, this can be made by a separate module, which solely purpose is to create the mapping between the PROTON and your ontology. You can map classes and properties there. Then you can use your classes and properties, as they are more relevant to your classes. > > Using any of the approaches will work (if you plan to use mainly your ontology). It is just a matter of good style to keep ontologies in separate modules and map them with a dedicated mapping module. > > There are functional differences in making your properties a subproperty of PROTON ones. If you make a query, using your properties, you will get statements with your properties only. If you make a query using the PROTON equivalent, you will get both statements with PROTON property and yours. > > Hope this helps, > Philip Alexiev, > Software Engineer, KIM team > > > On 6 Oct 2011, at 11:07 AM, Ho?ng C?ng Nguy?n wrote: > >> Hi, >> I'm using KIM platform 3.0-RC-4 and i've got some problems, please help me solving them: >> 1) I create new document, add to document repository >> >> DocumentRepositoryAPI apiDocs = kimService.getDocumentRepositoryAPI(); >> CorporaAPI apiCorpora = kimService.getCorporaAPI(); >> String content = DocumentResource.TEST_URL_01; >> KIMDocument doc = apiCorpora.createDocument(content, true); >> doc=apiSemnAnn.execute(doc); >> apiDocs.addDocument(doc); >> >> but when i browse web ui, i can't see this document and i must restart KIM to take effect. Is there any way adding new document to repository without restarting or it is the same problem with deleting document in http://www.mail-archive.com/kim-discussion at ontotext.com/msg00696.html? >> >> 2) In documentation, to import new instances into KB, i must create new file (nt..) , import it to owlim and restart to take effect. So with new instances got from annotated documents, is there another way to import them into KB using java API. >> >> 3) When i add my own ontology to KIM, there may be some properties which are the same as properties in PROTON, how i should do with them? Mapping it to PROTON's properties using rdfs:subPropertyOf or using only my properties or using only PROTON's properties... >> >> Regards. >> Cong >> -- >> Cong Hoang Nguyen >> University: Hanoi University of Techonology and Science. >> Email: congnh0902 at gmail.com >> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/monday0rsunday >> YH: congnh0902 >> Skype: monday0rsunday >> Phone: (+84)1678565200 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kim-discussion mailing list >> Kim-discussion at ontotext.com >> http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From philip.alexiev at ontotext.com Thu Oct 6 05:39:50 2011 From: philip.alexiev at ontotext.com (Philip Alexiev) Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 12:39:50 +0300 Subject: [Kim-discussion] Help - Adding to document repository, importing new instances got from annotations into KB using Java API. In-Reply-To: <9BA0489A-A387-4CE5-8B9F-BBF1E38C18FB@ontotext.com> References: <9BA0489A-A387-4CE5-8B9F-BBF1E38C18FB@ontotext.com> Message-ID: <3236CC7A-1797-4AF8-A3EA-83B7FFD422CC@ontotext.com> Hi Ho?ng C?ng Nguy?n, My apologies. The answer to the first question was not correct. KIM uses some indexes, which need to be synchronized when new documents are added. The javadoc provides a good description: /** * Synchronizes the index * *

* Asks the index to sync the newly added documents with the search results. * Before calling synchronizeIndex(true), documents recently added documents may * not be included the search results. Calling synchronizeIndex with force = false * cause the index to evaluate the need for synchronization and possibly postpone it. * * @throws DocumentRepositoryException * @return true - if operation was executed; false - if conditional execution * was invoked (force == false) and the operation was not initiated * due to conditions; */ @Description("Synchronizes the index") public boolean synchronizeIndex(@PName("force") boolean force) throws DocumentRepositoryException; All the best. Philip On 6 Oct 2011, at 12:29 PM, Philip Alexiev wrote: > > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Philip Alexiev >> Subject: Re: [Kim-discussion] Help - Adding to document repository, importing new instances got from annotations into KB using Java API. >> Date: 6 October 2011 12:26:11 PM GMT+03:00 >> To: Ho?ng C?ng Nguy?n >> Cc: KIM discussion >> >> Hello Ho?ng C?ng Nguy?n, >> >> I will answer the questions in order: >> >> 1) Adding the document through the DocumentRepositoryAPI is sufficient to be able to see it in the UI. Making a search for documents will show it. >> >> 2) New entities, found in documents, are automatically added to the semantic repository. They are assigned a label and a type. Also the relation is created, that this document mentions that entity. Adding them manually is not necessary. >> >> 3) The answer to this question is more a matter of style. You might want to keep your ontology as a separate, complete module, so using the properties from another ontology module might not be a good idea. You can relate the properties, by making them subproperties of PROTON's equivalents. In fact, this can be made by a separate module, which solely purpose is to create the mapping between the PROTON and your ontology. You can map classes and properties there. Then you can use your classes and properties, as they are more relevant to your classes. >> >> Using any of the approaches will work (if you plan to use mainly your ontology). It is just a matter of good style to keep ontologies in separate modules and map them with a dedicated mapping module. >> >> There are functional differences in making your properties a subproperty of PROTON ones. If you make a query, using your properties, you will get statements with your properties only. If you make a query using the PROTON equivalent, you will get both statements with PROTON property and yours. >> >> Hope this helps, >> Philip Alexiev, >> Software Engineer, KIM team >> >> >> On 6 Oct 2011, at 11:07 AM, Ho?ng C?ng Nguy?n wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> I'm using KIM platform 3.0-RC-4 and i've got some problems, please help me solving them: >>> 1) I create new document, add to document repository >>> >>> DocumentRepositoryAPI apiDocs = kimService.getDocumentRepositoryAPI(); >>> CorporaAPI apiCorpora = kimService.getCorporaAPI(); >>> String content = DocumentResource.TEST_URL_01; >>> KIMDocument doc = apiCorpora.createDocument(content, true); >>> doc=apiSemnAnn.execute(doc); >>> apiDocs.addDocument(doc); >>> >>> but when i browse web ui, i can't see this document and i must restart KIM to take effect. Is there any way adding new document to repository without restarting or it is the same problem with deleting document in http://www.mail-archive.com/kim-discussion at ontotext.com/msg00696.html? >>> >>> 2) In documentation, to import new instances into KB, i must create new file (nt..) , import it to owlim and restart to take effect. So with new instances got from annotated documents, is there another way to import them into KB using java API. >>> >>> 3) When i add my own ontology to KIM, there may be some properties which are the same as properties in PROTON, how i should do with them? Mapping it to PROTON's properties using rdfs:subPropertyOf or using only my properties or using only PROTON's properties... >>> >>> Regards. >>> Cong >>> -- >>> Cong Hoang Nguyen >>> University: Hanoi University of Techonology and Science. >>> Email: congnh0902 at gmail.com >>> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/monday0rsunday >>> YH: congnh0902 >>> Skype: monday0rsunday >>> Phone: (+84)1678565200 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Kim-discussion mailing list >>> Kim-discussion at ontotext.com >>> http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion >> > > _______________________________________________ > Kim-discussion mailing list > Kim-discussion at ontotext.com > http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From philip.alexiev at ontotext.com Thu Oct 6 08:22:36 2011 From: philip.alexiev at ontotext.com (Philip Alexiev) Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:22:36 +0300 Subject: [Kim-discussion] Help - Adding to document repository, importing new instances got from annotations into KB using Java API. In-Reply-To: References: <9BA0489A-A387-4CE5-8B9F-BBF1E38C18FB@ontotext.com> <3236CC7A-1797-4AF8-A3EA-83B7FFD422CC@ontotext.com> Message-ID: <888481A5-C786-4FAB-9332-8E6433B2EA32@ontotext.com> Hi again, KIM uses a combination of semantic repository (Owlim) and document repository (Lucene) to index and retrieve documents. Both store their indexes in KIM/context/default/populated . Exporting only the RDF will not be sufficient. So in order to backup, you will need to archive the whole "populated" folder. Although, I will advise archiving the whole KIM installation. Hope this helps, Philip On 6 Oct 2011, at 1:53 PM, Cong Nguyen wrote: > Hi, Philip > Thank you very much for your helpful answers. > I has another question in problem 2. I remember that i read somewhere in kim-discussion which said that all new entities, also documents, stored in /context/default/kb/populated. If there is any problem with KIM, i must delete all thing in this folder and repopulate all documents. So does KIM have any way to "backup" all entities, for example, export all entities to N-triples file. > Best regards. > Cong > > V?o 16:39 Ng?y 06 th?ng 10 n?m 2011, Philip Alexiev ?? vi?t: > Hi Ho?ng C?ng Nguy?n, > > My apologies. The answer to the first question was not correct. KIM uses some indexes, which need to be synchronized when new documents are added. The javadoc provides a good description: > > > /** > * Synchronizes the index > * > *

> * Asks the index to sync the newly added documents with the search results. > * Before calling synchronizeIndex(true), documents recently added documents may > * not be included the search results. Calling synchronizeIndex with force = false > * cause the index to evaluate the need for synchronization and possibly postpone it. > * > * @throws DocumentRepositoryException > * @return true - if operation was executed; false - if conditional execution > * was invoked (force == false) and the operation was not initiated > * due to conditions; > */ > @Description("Synchronizes the index") > public boolean synchronizeIndex(@PName("force") boolean force) throws DocumentRepositoryException; > > > All the best. > Philip > > On 6 Oct 2011, at 12:29 PM, Philip Alexiev wrote: > >> >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >>> From: Philip Alexiev >>> Subject: Re: [Kim-discussion] Help - Adding to document repository, importing new instances got from annotations into KB using Java API. >>> Date: 6 October 2011 12:26:11 PM GMT+03:00 >>> To: Ho?ng C?ng Nguy?n >>> Cc: KIM discussion >>> >>> Hello Ho?ng C?ng Nguy?n, >>> >>> I will answer the questions in order: >>> >>> 1) Adding the document through the DocumentRepositoryAPI is sufficient to be able to see it in the UI. Making a search for documents will show it. >>> >>> 2) New entities, found in documents, are automatically added to the semantic repository. They are assigned a label and a type. Also the relation is created, that this document mentions that entity. Adding them manually is not necessary. >>> >>> 3) The answer to this question is more a matter of style. You might want to keep your ontology as a separate, complete module, so using the properties from another ontology module might not be a good idea. You can relate the properties, by making them subproperties of PROTON's equivalents. In fact, this can be made by a separate module, which solely purpose is to create the mapping between the PROTON and your ontology. You can map classes and properties there. Then you can use your classes and properties, as they are more relevant to your classes. >>> >>> Using any of the approaches will work (if you plan to use mainly your ontology). It is just a matter of good style to keep ontologies in separate modules and map them with a dedicated mapping module. >>> >>> There are functional differences in making your properties a subproperty of PROTON ones. If you make a query, using your properties, you will get statements with your properties only. If you make a query using the PROTON equivalent, you will get both statements with PROTON property and yours. >>> >>> Hope this helps, >>> Philip Alexiev, >>> Software Engineer, KIM team >>> >>> >>> On 6 Oct 2011, at 11:07 AM, Ho?ng C?ng Nguy?n wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> I'm using KIM platform 3.0-RC-4 and i've got some problems, please help me solving them: >>>> 1) I create new document, add to document repository >>>> >>>> DocumentRepositoryAPI apiDocs = kimService.getDocumentRepositoryAPI(); >>>> CorporaAPI apiCorpora = kimService.getCorporaAPI(); >>>> String content = DocumentResource.TEST_URL_01; >>>> KIMDocument doc = apiCorpora.createDocument(content, true); >>>> doc=apiSemnAnn.execute(doc); >>>> apiDocs.addDocument(doc); >>>> >>>> but when i browse web ui, i can't see this document and i must restart KIM to take effect. Is there any way adding new document to repository without restarting or it is the same problem with deleting document in http://www.mail-archive.com/kim-discussion at ontotext.com/msg00696.html? >>>> >>>> 2) In documentation, to import new instances into KB, i must create new file (nt..) , import it to owlim and restart to take effect. So with new instances got from annotated documents, is there another way to import them into KB using java API. >>>> >>>> 3) When i add my own ontology to KIM, there may be some properties which are the same as properties in PROTON, how i should do with them? Mapping it to PROTON's properties using rdfs:subPropertyOf or using only my properties or using only PROTON's properties... >>>> >>>> Regards. >>>> Cong >>>> -- >>>> Cong Hoang Nguyen >>>> University: Hanoi University of Techonology and Science. >>>> Email: congnh0902 at gmail.com >>>> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/monday0rsunday >>>> YH: congnh0902 >>>> Skype: monday0rsunday >>>> Phone: (+84)1678565200 >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Kim-discussion mailing list >>>> Kim-discussion at ontotext.com >>>> http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kim-discussion mailing list >> Kim-discussion at ontotext.com >> http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion > > > > > -- > Cong Hoang Nguyen > University: Hanoi University of Techonology and Science. > Email: congnh0902 at gmail.com > Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/monday0rsunday > YH: congnh0902 > Skype: monday0rsunday > Phone: (+84)1678565200 > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From philip.alexiev at ontotext.com Thu Oct 6 08:23:00 2011 From: philip.alexiev at ontotext.com (Philip Alexiev) Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:23:00 +0300 Subject: [Kim-discussion] Help - Adding to document repository, importing new instances got from annotations into KB using Java API. In-Reply-To: References: <9BA0489A-A387-4CE5-8B9F-BBF1E38C18FB@ontotext.com> <3236CC7A-1797-4AF8-A3EA-83B7FFD422CC@ontotext.com> Message-ID: <6E6520B9-1424-4290-A58C-EE0CE0EE5EB1@ontotext.com> Hi again, KIM uses a combination of semantic repository (Owlim) and document repository (Lucene) to index and retrieve documents. Both store their indexes in KIM/context/default/populated . Exporting only the RDF will not be sufficient. So in order to backup, you will need to archive the whole "populated" folder. Although, I will advise archiving the whole KIM installation. Hope this helps, Philip On 6 Oct 2011, at 1:53 PM, Cong Nguyen wrote: > Hi, Philip > Thank you very much for your helpful answers. > I has another question in problem 2. I remember that i read somewhere in kim-discussion which said that all new entities, also documents, stored in /context/default/kb/populated. If there is any problem with KIM, i must delete all thing in this folder and repopulate all documents. So does KIM have any way to "backup" all entities, for example, export all entities to N-triples file. > Best regards. > Cong > > V?o 16:39 Ng?y 06 th?ng 10 n?m 2011, Philip Alexiev ?? vi?t: > Hi Ho?ng C?ng Nguy?n, > > My apologies. The answer to the first question was not correct. KIM uses some indexes, which need to be synchronized when new documents are added. The javadoc provides a good description: > > > /** > * Synchronizes the index > * > *

> * Asks the index to sync the newly added documents with the search results. > * Before calling synchronizeIndex(true), documents recently added documents may > * not be included the search results. Calling synchronizeIndex with force = false > * cause the index to evaluate the need for synchronization and possibly postpone it. > * > * @throws DocumentRepositoryException > * @return true - if operation was executed; false - if conditional execution > * was invoked (force == false) and the operation was not initiated > * due to conditions; > */ > @Description("Synchronizes the index") > public boolean synchronizeIndex(@PName("force") boolean force) throws DocumentRepositoryException; > > > All the best. > Philip > > On 6 Oct 2011, at 12:29 PM, Philip Alexiev wrote: > >> >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >>> From: Philip Alexiev >>> Subject: Re: [Kim-discussion] Help - Adding to document repository, importing new instances got from annotations into KB using Java API. >>> Date: 6 October 2011 12:26:11 PM GMT+03:00 >>> To: Ho?ng C?ng Nguy?n >>> Cc: KIM discussion >>> >>> Hello Ho?ng C?ng Nguy?n, >>> >>> I will answer the questions in order: >>> >>> 1) Adding the document through the DocumentRepositoryAPI is sufficient to be able to see it in the UI. Making a search for documents will show it. >>> >>> 2) New entities, found in documents, are automatically added to the semantic repository. They are assigned a label and a type. Also the relation is created, that this document mentions that entity. Adding them manually is not necessary. >>> >>> 3) The answer to this question is more a matter of style. You might want to keep your ontology as a separate, complete module, so using the properties from another ontology module might not be a good idea. You can relate the properties, by making them subproperties of PROTON's equivalents. In fact, this can be made by a separate module, which solely purpose is to create the mapping between the PROTON and your ontology. You can map classes and properties there. Then you can use your classes and properties, as they are more relevant to your classes. >>> >>> Using any of the approaches will work (if you plan to use mainly your ontology). It is just a matter of good style to keep ontologies in separate modules and map them with a dedicated mapping module. >>> >>> There are functional differences in making your properties a subproperty of PROTON ones. If you make a query, using your properties, you will get statements with your properties only. If you make a query using the PROTON equivalent, you will get both statements with PROTON property and yours. >>> >>> Hope this helps, >>> Philip Alexiev, >>> Software Engineer, KIM team >>> >>> >>> On 6 Oct 2011, at 11:07 AM, Ho?ng C?ng Nguy?n wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> I'm using KIM platform 3.0-RC-4 and i've got some problems, please help me solving them: >>>> 1) I create new document, add to document repository >>>> >>>> DocumentRepositoryAPI apiDocs = kimService.getDocumentRepositoryAPI(); >>>> CorporaAPI apiCorpora = kimService.getCorporaAPI(); >>>> String content = DocumentResource.TEST_URL_01; >>>> KIMDocument doc = apiCorpora.createDocument(content, true); >>>> doc=apiSemnAnn.execute(doc); >>>> apiDocs.addDocument(doc); >>>> >>>> but when i browse web ui, i can't see this document and i must restart KIM to take effect. Is there any way adding new document to repository without restarting or it is the same problem with deleting document in http://www.mail-archive.com/kim-discussion at ontotext.com/msg00696.html? >>>> >>>> 2) In documentation, to import new instances into KB, i must create new file (nt..) , import it to owlim and restart to take effect. So with new instances got from annotated documents, is there another way to import them into KB using java API. >>>> >>>> 3) When i add my own ontology to KIM, there may be some properties which are the same as properties in PROTON, how i should do with them? Mapping it to PROTON's properties using rdfs:subPropertyOf or using only my properties or using only PROTON's properties... >>>> >>>> Regards. >>>> Cong >>>> -- >>>> Cong Hoang Nguyen >>>> University: Hanoi University of Techonology and Science. >>>> Email: congnh0902 at gmail.com >>>> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/monday0rsunday >>>> YH: congnh0902 >>>> Skype: monday0rsunday >>>> Phone: (+84)1678565200 >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Kim-discussion mailing list >>>> Kim-discussion at ontotext.com >>>> http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kim-discussion mailing list >> Kim-discussion at ontotext.com >> http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion > > > > > -- > Cong Hoang Nguyen > University: Hanoi University of Techonology and Science. > Email: congnh0902 at gmail.com > Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/monday0rsunday > YH: congnh0902 > Skype: monday0rsunday > Phone: (+84)1678565200 > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From j.forth at gold.ac.uk Sun Oct 9 07:36:59 2011 From: j.forth at gold.ac.uk (Jamie Forth) Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 12:36:59 +0100 Subject: [Kim-discussion] SPARQL endpoint? Message-ID: <1318160219.14555.2.camel@harrison.doc.gold.ac.uk> Hi, Is it possible to enable a SPARQL endpoint for remote querying? Or is access to the RDF only possible via the API? I'm using the current KIM release (3.0-RC4-svn-6874) and so far have found it to be very impressive. I understand that the Sesame-Web-UI is not available in KIM 3, but that is fine I am not really looking of a GUI. Many thanks, Jamie From philip.alexiev at ontotext.com Mon Oct 10 03:32:32 2011 From: philip.alexiev at ontotext.com (Philip Alexiev) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:32:32 +0300 Subject: [Kim-discussion] SPARQL endpoint? In-Reply-To: <1318160219.14555.2.camel@harrison.doc.gold.ac.uk> References: <1318160219.14555.2.camel@harrison.doc.gold.ac.uk> Message-ID: <2E1C1051-7281-46B1-B4C1-383C0C06D93C@ontotext.com> Hi Jamie, In KIM release 3.0-RC4 the way to communicate with the semantic repository is through the API or using the exposed MBeans. You can use the MBeans with JVisualVM or JConsole to query the RDF in KIM. I have provided a screenshot of JVisualVM using the SemanticRepositoryMgmt bean. Just for information, the next release of KIM will provide a convenient graphical web tool to explore the semantic repository. It is developed locally at Ontotext and is called Forest. A brief overview can be seen here: http://www.ontotext.com/sites/default/files/downloads/Introducing%20Forest_2010.pdf Forest also exposes a sparql endpoint. Hope this helps, Philip Alexiev Software Engineer, KIM team On 9 Oct 2011, at 2:36 PM, Jamie Forth wrote: > Hi, > > Is it possible to enable a SPARQL endpoint for remote querying? Or is > access to the RDF only possible via the API? > > I'm using the current KIM release (3.0-RC4-svn-6874) and so far have > found it to be very impressive. I understand that the Sesame-Web-UI is > not available in KIM 3, but that is fine I am not really looking of a > GUI. > > Many thanks, > > Jamie > > > _______________________________________________ > Kim-discussion mailing list > Kim-discussion at ontotext.com > http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: JVisualVM_n_MBeans.png Type: image/png Size: 253573 bytes Desc: not available URL: From j.forth at gold.ac.uk Mon Oct 10 05:13:11 2011 From: j.forth at gold.ac.uk (Jamie Forth) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:13:11 +0100 Subject: [Kim-discussion] SPARQL endpoint? In-Reply-To: <2E1C1051-7281-46B1-B4C1-383C0C06D93C@ontotext.com> References: <1318160219.14555.2.camel@harrison.doc.gold.ac.uk> <2E1C1051-7281-46B1-B4C1-383C0C06D93C@ontotext.com> Message-ID: <1318237991.17782.7.camel@harrison.doc.gold.ac.uk> On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 10:32 +0300, Philip Alexiev wrote: > In KIM release 3.0-RC4 the way to communicate with the semantic > repository is through the API or using the exposed MBeans. Thanks for the clarification. > Forest also exposes a sparql endpoint. This is what I'm looking for, I look forward to the next release. In the meantime, we have OWLIM-SE and openrdf-sesame also installed on the same server as KIM. Is it possible to configure KIM to use this instance as the semantic repository, or are the KIM distributions customised in some way that would make this not possible? Thanks again, Jamie From philip.alexiev at ontotext.com Mon Oct 10 05:28:31 2011 From: philip.alexiev at ontotext.com (Philip Alexiev) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:28:31 +0300 Subject: [Kim-discussion] SPARQL endpoint? In-Reply-To: <1318237991.17782.7.camel@harrison.doc.gold.ac.uk> References: <1318160219.14555.2.camel@harrison.doc.gold.ac.uk> <2E1C1051-7281-46B1-B4C1-383C0C06D93C@ontotext.com> <1318237991.17782.7.camel@harrison.doc.gold.ac.uk> Message-ID: Hi again, Unfortunately, we do not support this in the public release. Although, this functionality is currently implemented and KIM can be configured to work with a remote sparql endpoint, instead of running an encapsulated Owlim inside. This will also come with the new release. All the best, Philip Alexiev On 10 Oct 2011, at 12:13 PM, Jamie Forth wrote: > On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 10:32 +0300, Philip Alexiev wrote: > >> In KIM release 3.0-RC4 the way to communicate with the semantic >> repository is through the API or using the exposed MBeans. > > Thanks for the clarification. > >> Forest also exposes a sparql endpoint. > > This is what I'm looking for, I look forward to the next release. > > In the meantime, we have OWLIM-SE and openrdf-sesame also installed on > the same server as KIM. Is it possible to configure KIM to use this > instance as the semantic repository, or are the KIM distributions > customised in some way that would make this not possible? > > Thanks again, > > Jamie > > > > _______________________________________________ > Kim-discussion mailing list > Kim-discussion at ontotext.com > http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion From philip.alexiev at ontotext.com Mon Oct 10 05:29:03 2011 From: philip.alexiev at ontotext.com (Philip Alexiev) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:29:03 +0300 Subject: [Kim-discussion] SPARQL endpoint? In-Reply-To: <1318237991.17782.7.camel@harrison.doc.gold.ac.uk> References: <1318160219.14555.2.camel@harrison.doc.gold.ac.uk> <2E1C1051-7281-46B1-B4C1-383C0C06D93C@ontotext.com> <1318237991.17782.7.camel@harrison.doc.gold.ac.uk> Message-ID: Hi again, Unfortunately, we do not support this in the public release. Although, this functionality is currently implemented and KIM can be configured to work with a remote sparql endpoint, instead of running an encapsulated Owlim inside. This will also come with the new release. All the best, Philip Alexiev On 10 Oct 2011, at 12:13 PM, Jamie Forth wrote: > On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 10:32 +0300, Philip Alexiev wrote: > >> In KIM release 3.0-RC4 the way to communicate with the semantic >> repository is through the API or using the exposed MBeans. > > Thanks for the clarification. > >> Forest also exposes a sparql endpoint. > > This is what I'm looking for, I look forward to the next release. > > In the meantime, we have OWLIM-SE and openrdf-sesame also installed on > the same server as KIM. Is it possible to configure KIM to use this > instance as the semantic repository, or are the KIM distributions > customised in some way that would make this not possible? > > Thanks again, > > Jamie > > > > _______________________________________________ > Kim-discussion mailing list > Kim-discussion at ontotext.com > http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion From rddc at uninova.pt Fri Oct 14 10:15:54 2011 From: rddc at uninova.pt (Ruben Costa) Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:15:54 +0100 Subject: [Kim-discussion] Unable to start KIM Message-ID: <00b301cc8a7b$c9272ca0$5b7585e0$@uninova.pt> Hello all, I'm facing some problems in running KIM on a Windows 7 x64 OS. I'm getting the following error message: Exception in thread "ComponentStarter-Thread-2" java.lang.InternalError: Cannot find javac resource bundle for locale en_US Any help is very much appreciated. Thank you all. Best regards, -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From philip.alexiev at ontotext.com Fri Oct 14 10:58:04 2011 From: philip.alexiev at ontotext.com (Philip Alexiev) Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:58:04 +0300 Subject: [Kim-discussion] Unable to start KIM In-Reply-To: <00b301cc8a7b$c9272ca0$5b7585e0$@uninova.pt> References: <00b301cc8a7b$c9272ca0$5b7585e0$@uninova.pt> Message-ID: Hello Mr. Costa, It looks like the cause for the problem is not in KIM or its underlying services. Most likely the Java installation you use is incomplete and is missing a localization for javac (resource bundle). You may consider downloading the latest JDK from the official site. Thank you for your interest in KIM, Philip Alexiev Software Engineer, KIM team On 14 Oct 2011, at 5:15 PM, Ruben Costa wrote: > Hello all, > > I?m facing some problems in running KIM on a Windows 7 x64 OS. > I?m getting the following error message: > Exception in thread "ComponentStarter-Thread-2" java.lang.InternalError: > Cannot find javac resource bundle for locale en_US > > Any help is very much appreciated. > > Thank you all. > > Best regards, > _______________________________________________ > Kim-discussion mailing list > Kim-discussion at ontotext.com > http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rddc at uninova.pt Fri Oct 14 11:17:58 2011 From: rddc at uninova.pt (Ruben Costa) Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:17:58 +0100 Subject: [Kim-discussion] Unable to start KIM In-Reply-To: References: <00b301cc8a7b$c9272ca0$5b7585e0$@uninova.pt> Message-ID: <00c101cc8a84$74e06180$5ea12480$@uninova.pt> Thank you Mr. Alexiev for your promptly answer. I've just download the last JDK version from the official site, but the error still persists. Maybe the error is not directly related with the JDK. Any other guess is very welcome. Thank you. From: Philip Alexiev [mailto:philip.alexiev at ontotext.com] Sent: sexta-feira, 14 de Outubro de 2011 15:58 To: Ruben Costa Cc: Kim-discussion at ontotext.com Subject: Re: [Kim-discussion] Unable to start KIM Hello Mr. Costa, It looks like the cause for the problem is not in KIM or its underlying services. Most likely the Java installation you use is incomplete and is missing a localization for javac (resource bundle). You may consider downloading the latest JDK from the official site. Thank you for your interest in KIM, Philip Alexiev Software Engineer, KIM team On 14 Oct 2011, at 5:15 PM, Ruben Costa wrote: Hello all, I'm facing some problems in running KIM on a Windows 7 x64 OS. I'm getting the following error message: Exception in thread "ComponentStarter-Thread-2" java.lang.InternalError: Cannot find javac resource bundle for locale en_US Any help is very much appreciated. Thank you all. Best regards, _______________________________________________ Kim-discussion mailing list Kim-discussion at ontotext.com http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rddc at uninova.pt Fri Oct 14 13:01:46 2011 From: rddc at uninova.pt (Ruben Costa) Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 18:01:46 +0100 Subject: [Kim-discussion] Unable to start KIM In-Reply-To: References: <00b301cc8a7b$c9272ca0$5b7585e0$@uninova.pt> Message-ID: <00db01cc8a92$f4ff92b0$defeb810$@uninova.pt> Hello again, It seems that the error is related with Java installation alright, but with the version of Java installed. I've tried to downgrade to JDK ver. 1.6.0_27 and it's working ok. Not working with the latest JDK version (JDK 1.7.0) Thank you once again. Best regards, From: Philip Alexiev [mailto:philip.alexiev at ontotext.com] Sent: sexta-feira, 14 de Outubro de 2011 15:58 To: Ruben Costa Cc: Kim-discussion at ontotext.com Subject: Re: [Kim-discussion] Unable to start KIM Hello Mr. Costa, It looks like the cause for the problem is not in KIM or its underlying services. Most likely the Java installation you use is incomplete and is missing a localization for javac (resource bundle). You may consider downloading the latest JDK from the official site. Thank you for your interest in KIM, Philip Alexiev Software Engineer, KIM team On 14 Oct 2011, at 5:15 PM, Ruben Costa wrote: Hello all, I'm facing some problems in running KIM on a Windows 7 x64 OS. I'm getting the following error message: Exception in thread "ComponentStarter-Thread-2" java.lang.InternalError: Cannot find javac resource bundle for locale en_US Any help is very much appreciated. Thank you all. Best regards, _______________________________________________ Kim-discussion mailing list Kim-discussion at ontotext.com http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From philip.alexiev at ontotext.com Fri Oct 14 13:04:43 2011 From: philip.alexiev at ontotext.com (Philip Alexiev) Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 20:04:43 +0300 Subject: [Kim-discussion] Unable to start KIM In-Reply-To: <00db01cc8a92$f4ff92b0$defeb810$@uninova.pt> References: <00b301cc8a7b$c9272ca0$5b7585e0$@uninova.pt> <00db01cc8a92$f4ff92b0$defeb810$@uninova.pt> Message-ID: <44164BF0-ED0C-484F-9CC2-B3CCD7D7F104@ontotext.com> Hello, Thank you for the feedback. All the best, Philip On 14 Oct 2011, at 8:01 PM, Ruben Costa wrote: > Hello again, > > It seems that the error is related with Java installation alright, but with the version of Java installed. > I?ve tried to downgrade to JDK ver. 1.6.0_27 and it?s working ok. Not working with the latest JDK version (JDK 1.7.0) > Thank you once again. > > Best regards, > > From: Philip Alexiev [mailto:philip.alexiev at ontotext.com] > Sent: sexta-feira, 14 de Outubro de 2011 15:58 > To: Ruben Costa > Cc: Kim-discussion at ontotext.com > Subject: Re: [Kim-discussion] Unable to start KIM > > Hello Mr. Costa, > > It looks like the cause for the problem is not in KIM or its underlying services. Most likely the Java installation you use is incomplete and is missing a localization for javac (resource bundle). You may consider downloading the latest JDK from the official site. > > Thank you for your interest in KIM, > Philip Alexiev > Software Engineer, KIM team > > > On 14 Oct 2011, at 5:15 PM, Ruben Costa wrote: > > > Hello all, > > I?m facing some problems in running KIM on a Windows 7 x64 OS. > I?m getting the following error message: > Exception in thread "ComponentStarter-Thread-2" java.lang.InternalError: > Cannot find javac resource bundle for locale en_US > > Any help is very much appreciated. > > Thank you all. > > Best regards, > _______________________________________________ > Kim-discussion mailing list > Kim-discussion at ontotext.com > http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion > > _______________________________________________ > Kim-discussion mailing list > Kim-discussion at ontotext.com > http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From congnh0902 at gmail.com Mon Oct 24 00:39:12 2011 From: congnh0902 at gmail.com (Cong Nguyen) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:39:12 +0700 Subject: [Kim-discussion] Help - More about customizing IE of KIM Message-ID: Hello everybody. I would like to customize KIM IE for only our domain ontology (about sport): annotating only instances which classes are, or have relationship with classes in our ontology. But i don't know how to do, and what is ongoing in KIM IE processing. Please suggest me some advices and, if possible, let me know more details about KIM IE processing. Thank you in advance. Cong -- Cong Hoang Nguyen University: Hanoi University of Science and Techonology. Email: congnh0902 at gmail.com Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/monday0rsunday YH: congnh0902 Skype: monday0rsunday Phone: (+84)1678565200 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From philip.alexiev at ontotext.com Mon Oct 24 09:30:03 2011 From: philip.alexiev at ontotext.com (Philip Alexiev) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:30:03 +0300 Subject: [Kim-discussion] Help - More about customizing IE of KIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <107F0E66-D9F5-4DF5-83FD-CD6163D649EB@ontotext.com> Hello Cong Nguyen, You have many choices here. The first decision is whether you want to use the ontology KIM provides (it is general enough to be usable in most of the cases). In this case you have to map your specific ontology to proton. We have an official guide how this is done. Or you can decide to use your ontology only. I will address this case below. KIM knows what ontology to load on init, by checking at the configuration in KIM/config/owlim.ttl . There at the bottom you can see relative paths to RDF files and their corresponding namespaces. You can rewrite those settings and put your ontology files there (do not forget to clear the caches after). When KIM starts next time, it will load your ontology, instead of PROTON + KIM world knowledge base. Next , the gazetteer should be configured to fill its dictionary with the terms from the new ontology. The good news is the query that provides the data for the dictionary is configurable. If you look at the configuration of the LKB Gazetteer resource in the pipeline, you will see: dictFeederParams : [AllUpperEnrichment=true, IgnoreAliasListPath=, FeedSetupPath=$relpath$../../../config] FeedSetupPath is the location where the gazetteer will look for a file called query.txt . This file holds either a sparql or serql query, returning the concepts that will be recognizable by the gazetteer. The query should return : label of the entity , entity URI , entity direct class . The order is important. When the gazetteer is run over the text, it will match the 'label' and assign the 'uri' and 'class' to the newly created annotations. So you can either setup your own path or create a file - query.txt in KIM/config/ with your custom query. Here is a very basic SeRQL query, that you can use as a starting point: select LA, I, DC from ( {I} serql:directType {DC}, {I} rdfs:label {LA} ) Setting up the gazetteer is not sufficient to incorporate your ontology in the Information Extraction. Some of the other resources should be tuned also. The process is described in more details at our official site: http://www.ontotext.com/sites/default/files/Customizing%20KIM3.pdf . Also please note, that we have some ontology conventions that are heavily used in the interface: - We expect that all the classes that we want to be visible in the interface, are marked visible. That is - each has such a statement: "" . - We expect that each entity in the gazetteer lists is generated by a trusted source. That is - there are such statements for each such entity: . and the source is declared as trusted : . A work in progress is to make the visual components configurable and not tied to the concrete ontology. But these changes won't see daylight until the next release. Thank you for using KIM. Philip Alexiev, Software Engineer, KIM team On 24 Oct 2011, at 7:39 AM, Cong Nguyen wrote: > Hello everybody. > I would like to customize KIM IE for only our domain ontology (about sport): annotating only instances which classes are, or have relationship with classes in our ontology. But i don't know how to do, and what is ongoing in KIM IE processing. Please suggest me some advices and, if possible, let me know more details about KIM IE processing. > Thank you in advance. > Cong > > -- > Cong Hoang Nguyen > University: Hanoi University of Science and Techonology. > Email: congnh0902 at gmail.com > Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/monday0rsunday > YH: congnh0902 > Skype: monday0rsunday > Phone: (+84)1678565200 > > _______________________________________________ > Kim-discussion mailing list > Kim-discussion at ontotext.com > http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From philip.alexiev at ontotext.com Mon Oct 24 16:30:20 2011 From: philip.alexiev at ontotext.com (Philip Alexiev) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 23:30:20 +0300 Subject: [Kim-discussion] [Interested-in-kim] Help In-Reply-To: <1319488093.42641.YahooMailClassic@web27402.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <1319488093.42641.YahooMailClassic@web27402.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1B41133F-3B86-4450-A868-907F6C630050@ontotext.com> Hi again, Thank you for the advice. It is very good. All the best, Philip On 24 Oct 2011, at 11:28 PM, kalthoum kalthoum wrote: > hello Philip, > thanks it works now. > Perhaps it would be preferable if you notice this problem in the quick start guide of KIM. > Sincerly, > Kalthoum > > > --- En date de : Lun 24.10.11, Philip Alexiev a ?crit : > >> De: Philip Alexiev >> Objet: Re: [Interested-in-kim] Help >> ?: interested-in-kim at ontotext.com >> Cc: kalthoum_isg at yahoo.fr >> Date: Lundi 24 octobre 2011, 15h47 >> Hello Kalthoum, >> >> KIM is not compatible with jdk1.7 . >> Please try with the latest jdk1.6 . >> >> Thank you for your interest in KIM. >> >> Philip Alexiev >> Software Engineer, KIM team >> >> >> >> On 24 Oct 2011, at 4:40 PM, KIM Platform info newsletter >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> --- En date de : Dim 23.10.11, kalthoum kalthoum >> >> a ?crit : >>> >>>> De: kalthoum kalthoum >>>> Objet: Help >>>> ?: interested-in-kim at ontotext.com >>>> Date: Dimanche 23 octobre 2011, 23h02 >>>> Hi, >>>> I'm trying to start KIM3 server but I encounter >> this >>>> problem: >>>> exception in thread "componentstarter-thread-2" >>>> java.lang.internal error cannot find javac >> resource bundle >>>> for locale fr_FR. >>>> Knowing that I installed jdk1.7.0_01 and Tomcat >> 7.0. >>>> Sincerly, >>>> Kalthoum >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> interested-in-KIM mailing list >>> interested-in-KIM at ontotext.com >>> http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/interested-in-kim >> >>