From sreckojoksimovic at gmail.com Fri Sep 2 08:11:06 2011 From: sreckojoksimovic at gmail.com (srecko joksimovic) Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 14:11:06 +0200 Subject: [Kim-discussion] Keyword and description problem Message-ID: Hello, I have configured KIM to annotate using my ontology. And that part works fine. But, I have noticed a strange behavior. When I annotate this page: http://www.keytometals.com/page.aspx?ID=CheckArticle&LN=EN&site=KTS&NM=67 I never get term "Stainless Steel" (which is in ontology). But I get titanium, and few more terms that should not be there. But, when I annotate this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stainless_steel there is "Stainless Steel", among other terms. I checked pages, and what I saw is that the first page has defined keywords and description. I could find term "Titanium" among keywords and in description, but not "Stainless Steel". The other page does not have defined keywords and description, and annotation is good. Looks like when KIM finds keywords and description, it does not search the rest of the text. In this case, keywords and description are wrong. Is this behavior "normal", and how can I make it search the rest of the text? Best regards, Srecko Joksimovic -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From borislav at sirma.bg Fri Sep 2 09:14:42 2011 From: borislav at sirma.bg (borislav popov) Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 16:14:42 +0300 Subject: [Kim-discussion] Keyword and description problem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <94D1C8B9-E71E-475A-8D2E-0C057AD7C4F6@sirma.bg> Hi Srecko, the reason should be different. But thanks for observing this. The guys will look at it when they have time - it is a bit hot here in them moment. thanks B On Sep 2, 2011, at 3:11 PM, srecko joksimovic wrote: > Hello, > > I have configured KIM to annotate using my ontology. And that part works fine. But, I have noticed a strange behavior. > > When I annotate this page: > > http://www.keytometals.com/page.aspx?ID=CheckArticle&LN=EN&site=KTS&NM=67 > > I never get term "Stainless Steel" (which is in ontology). But I get titanium, and few more terms that should not be there. But, when I annotate this page: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stainless_steel > > there is "Stainless Steel", among other terms. I checked pages, and what I saw is that the first page has defined keywords and description. I could find term "Titanium" among keywords and in description, but not "Stainless Steel". The other page does not have defined keywords and description, and annotation is good. > > Looks like when KIM finds keywords and description, it does not search the rest of the text. In this case, keywords and description are wrong. > Is this behavior "normal", and how can I make it search the rest of the text? > > Best regards, > Srecko Joksimovic > _______________________________________________ > Kim-discussion mailing list > Kim-discussion at ontotext.com > http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sreckojoksimovic at gmail.com Fri Sep 2 10:22:09 2011 From: sreckojoksimovic at gmail.com (Srecko Joksimovic) Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 16:22:09 +0200 Subject: [Kim-discussion] Keyword and description problem In-Reply-To: <94D1C8B9-E71E-475A-8D2E-0C057AD7C4F6@sirma.bg> References: <94D1C8B9-E71E-475A-8D2E-0C057AD7C4F6@sirma.bg> Message-ID: <001b01cc697b$b3f65160$1be2f420$@com> Hi Borislav, And thank you! I don't think this is such a big problem for you guys. Best, Srecko From: borislav popov [mailto:borislav at sirma.bg] Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 15:15 To: srecko joksimovic Cc: kim-discussion at ontotext.com mailing-list; Philip Alexiev @ Ontotext; Boyan Kukushev Subject: Re: [Kim-discussion] Keyword and description problem Hi Srecko, the reason should be different. But thanks for observing this. The guys will look at it when they have time - it is a bit hot here in them moment. thanks B On Sep 2, 2011, at 3:11 PM, srecko joksimovic wrote: Hello, I have configured KIM to annotate using my ontology. And that part works fine. But, I have noticed a strange behavior. When I annotate this page: http://www.keytometals.com/page.aspx?ID=CheckArticle&LN=EN&site=KTS&NM=67 I never get term "Stainless Steel" (which is in ontology). But I get titanium, and few more terms that should not be there. But, when I annotate this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stainless_steel there is "Stainless Steel", among other terms. I checked pages, and what I saw is that the first page has defined keywords and description. I could find term "Titanium" among keywords and in description, but not "Stainless Steel". The other page does not have defined keywords and description, and annotation is good. Looks like when KIM finds keywords and description, it does not search the rest of the text. In this case, keywords and description are wrong. Is this behavior "normal", and how can I make it search the rest of the text? Best regards, Srecko Joksimovic _______________________________________________ Kim-discussion mailing list Kim-discussion at ontotext.com http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mpetrillo at ontotext.com Mon Sep 5 14:39:47 2011 From: mpetrillo at ontotext.com (Matthew Petrillo) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:39:47 -0400 Subject: [Kim-discussion] Reg. SELUDXHELMER & SELUDXSTIG server migration. In-Reply-To: <7184F2A059184B47BB4E6E5104B870C009742D49@ukblemembx01.emea.astrazeneca.net> References: <7184F2A059184B47BB4E6E5104B870C009742D49@ukblemembx01.emea.astrazeneca.net> Message-ID: <001301cc6bfb$3165f2f0$9431d8d0$@ontotext.com> Gentlemen, I am copying the information I have from KIM support. I hope this is helpful. Regards, Matt Petrillo Hi Guys, I cannot say the exact reasons, but from what I see in KIM's codebase and in the forums, it looks like KIM can not create the RMI registry. And the most possible reason is that a firewall is present. I guess RMI uses some additional ports when establishing connections. Unfortunately I can not say what ports exactly. I need more time to investigate and dig into the issue. Disabling the firewall should be enough to see whether this is the problem. But further instructions how to fix it will require more time. Greetings, Philip On 5 Sep 2011, at 3:17 PM, borislav popov wrote: Matt, Answer is: KIM Server has started; KIM Server has not been registered in the RMI registry due to " KIMService is not registered due to: Connection refused to host: 172.20.208.161; " I.e. client apps (like UIs or smth) won't be able to connect to the KIM server. I will double check this with Philip and chase Vaso B From: Shankar, Babu Ram (Cognizant) [mailto:BabuRam.Shankar at astrazeneca.com] Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 7:43 AM To: kim-discussion at ontotext.com; mpetrillo at ontotext.com Cc: Vassil Momtchev; Manthirarajan, Subramaniraja (Cognizant); Shanmugam, Ashok (Cognizant); Poduthas, Edward (Cognizant); Rajasekaran, Ganesh (Cognizant) Subject: FW: Reg. SELUDXHELMER & SELUDXSTIG server migration. Importance: High Hi Team, We couldn?t reach Vassil, who is the dedicated support person for the KIM repository setup in AstraZeneca, hence I am forwarding this to you. Please assist us and understand that this is a serious issue and needs to be fixed as soon as possible. Please read the below communication for the complete understanding of the issue and let us know if you need any more information to discuss on this. Please share your contact number also, so that I can request my technical team to talk to you. Thanks, Babu Ram Shankar | Cognizant Application Service Manager - GDD | W: +44 (0) 1625 51 4632 | M: +44 (0) 7818 477 480 _____________________________________________ From: Rajasekaran, Ganesh (Cognizant) Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:05 AM To: Vassil Momtchev Cc: Manthirarajan, Subramaniraja (Cognizant); Shanmugam, Ashok (Cognizant); Shankar, Babu Ram (Cognizant); Singh, Dinesh (Cognizant); Poduthas, Edward (Cognizant) Subject: RE: Reg. SELUDXHELMER & SELUDXSTIG server migration. Hi Vassil, Please find the attached screen shot below. I have executed the startup.sh command too. Can you please confirm whether the KIM is up and running.. ole0 Thanks and Regards, Ganesh Rajasekaran | Cognizant Application Specialist - GDD | +44 800 731 3780 | VNet 448102 _____________________________________________ From: Rajasekaran, Ganesh (Cognizant) Sent: 05 September 2011 08:56 To: 'Vassil Momtchev' Cc: Manthirarajan, Subramaniraja (Cognizant) Subject: RE: Reg. SELUDXHELMER & SELUDXSTIG server migration. Hi Vassil, We have executed the start up commands for the KIM and we have received the message that can be found in the attached document. << File: LINUX servers startup.doc >> I tried opening up the nohup.out file to check and found the below messages. Pre-Production (SELUDXHELMER): [INFO] KIM Server startup ended! [INFO] KIMService is not registered due to: Connection refused to host: 172.20.208.163; nested exception is: java.net.ConnectException: Connection timed out Production (SELUDXSTIG): [INFO] KIM Server startup ended! [INFO] KIMService is not registered due to: Connection refused to host: 172.20.208.161; nested exception is: java.net.ConnectException: Connection timed out Please confirm whether the KIM is up and running or there are any problems in the start-up of the Kim so that we can address is ASAP. Thanks in advance. Thanks and Regards, Ganesh Rajasekaran | Cognizant Application Specialist - GDD | +44 800 731 3780 | VNet 448102 _____ AstraZeneca UK Limited is a company incorporated in England and Wales with registered number: 03674842 and a registered office at 2 Kingdom Street, London, W2 6BD. Confidentiality Notice: This message is private and may contain confidential, proprietary and legally privileged information. If you have received this message in error, please notify us and remove it from your system and note that you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Any unauthorised use or disclosure of the contents of this message is not permitted and may be unlawful. Disclaimer: Email messages may be subject to delays, interception, non-delivery and unauthorised alterations. Therefore, information expressed in this message is not given or endorsed by AstraZeneca UK Limited unless otherwise notified by an authorised representative independent of this message. No contractual relationship is created by this message by any person unless specifically indicated by agreement in writing other than email. Monitoring: AstraZeneca UK Limited may monitor email traffic data and content for the purposes of the prevention and detection of crime, ensuring the security of our computer systems and checking compliance with our Code of Conduct and policies. -----Original Message----- From: Vassil Momtchev [mailto:vassil.momtchev at ontotext.com] Sent: 31 August 2011 07:57 To: Rajasekaran, Ganesh (Cognizant) Cc: Manthirarajan, Subramaniraja (Cognizant) Subject: Re: Reg. SELUDXHELMER & SELUDXSTIG server migration. Ganesh, Yes that is correct all KIM operations for release 3.0.10592 are executed from the path: /export/home/a_bsi/kim-3.0.10592/bin Then you should type: a) to stop the service ./kim stop b.1) to start the service and be able to disconnect with the terminal without stopping the process nohup ./kim start & b.2) to start the apache tomcat web server (you don't have to stop it explicitly during shutdown since no persistence information is kept) cd /export/home/a_bsi/apache-tomcat/bin/ startup.sh Cheers, V. On 8/29/2011 8:35 AM, Rajasekaran, Ganesh (Cognizant) wrote: > Hi Vassil, > > Thanks for the information. > > The highestrevisionof KIM should be "kim-3.0.10592". Please correct me > if I am wrong. > And to restart the service, navigating to the path and issuing the > command*//**//**/./kim start/*should work right!! > > *******Thanks and Regards,* > > *Ganesh Rajasekaran | Cognizant Application Specialist - GDD | +44 800 > 731 3780 | VNet 448102* > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vassil Momtchev [mailto:vassil.momtchev at ontotext.com] > Sent: 27 August 2011 19:14 > To: Rajasekaran, Ganesh (Cognizant) > Cc: Poduthas, Edward (Cognizant); Shanmugam, Ashok (Cognizant); > Manthirarajan, Subramaniraja (Cognizant); Shankar, Babu Ram (Cognizant) > Subject: Re: Reg. SELUDXHELMER & SELUDXSTIG server migration. > > Hi Ganesh, > > Yes, it is required to shutdown the KIM server before to switch off the > > machine. This is the only way to be 100% sure that all services will > > start without any issues afterwards. > > To stop the service you need to login to each server and execute from > > the command line: > > cd /export/home/a_bsi/kim- [press tab and select the highest revision] > > cd bin > > ./kim stop > > Do not hesitate to contact me if you face any problems! > > Cheers, > > V. > > On 8/26/2011 12:25 PM, Rajasekaran, Ganesh (Cognizant) wrote: > >> Hi Vassil, > >> > >> We are awaiting your comments on this. > >> Thanks in advance. > >> > >> Thanks and Regards, > >> > >> *Ganesh Rajasekaran*| Cognizant Application Specialist - GDD | +44 800 > >> 731 3780 | VNet 448102 > >> > >> *From:*Rajasekaran, Ganesh (Cognizant) > >> *Sent:* 25 August 2011 13:59 > >> *To:* 'Vassil Momtchev' > >> *Cc:* Poduthas, Edward (Cognizant); Shanmugam, Ashok (Cognizant); > >> Manthirarajan, Subramaniraja (Cognizant); Shankar, Babu Ram (Cognizant) > >> *Subject:* Reg. SELUDXHELMER & SELUDXSTIG server migration. > >> > >> Hi Vassil, > >> > >> The severs */SELUDXHELMER/* and */SELUDXSTIG/* are going to be migrated > >> to the new site as per the plan of the server migration program. > >> > >> The time window for migration has been identified from */02-Sep-2011/* > >> to */07-Sep-2011/*. > >> > >> Can you please confirm whether are there any services that needs to be > >> brought down before shutting down the servers and do we have any DB > >> related services to be switched off before we shut down the server. > >> > >> Awaiting your reply. > >> > >> Thanks and Regards, > >> > >> *Ganesh Rajasekaran*| Cognizant Application Specialist - GDD | +44 800 > >> 731 3780 | VNet 448102 > >> > > > -- > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Vassil Momtchev > > Head of Life Science R&D of Ontotext AD > > http://www.ontotext.com > > Skype: vassil_momtchev > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > -- ---------------------------------------------------------- Vassil Momtchev Head of Life Science R&D of Ontotext AD http://www.ontotext.com Skype: vassil_momtchev ---------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 56861 bytes Desc: not available URL: From philip.alexiev at ontotext.com Wed Sep 7 03:11:07 2011 From: philip.alexiev at ontotext.com (Philip Alexiev @ Ontotext) Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 10:11:07 +0300 Subject: [Kim-discussion] Keyword and description problem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Srecko, I noticed that in the first document the term is mentioned as "Stainless Steel" and in the second as "Stainless steel" and "stainless steel". My guess is that you have a case sensitive gazetteer and the term is in it either as "stainless steel" or "Stainless steel" . Is this the cse ? If not please send the pipeline if it is different from the standard KIM pipeline, and also the part of the ontology that describes "Stainless steel" . Thank you, Philip Alexiev Software Engineer, KIM team On 2 Sep 2011, at 3:11 PM, srecko joksimovic wrote: > Hello, > > I have configured KIM to annotate using my ontology. And that part works fine. But, I have noticed a strange behavior. > > When I annotate this page: > > http://www.keytometals.com/page.aspx?ID=CheckArticle&LN=EN&site=KTS&NM=67 > > I never get term "Stainless Steel" (which is in ontology). But I get titanium, and few more terms that should not be there. But, when I annotate this page: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stainless_steel > > there is "Stainless Steel", among other terms. I checked pages, and what I saw is that the first page has defined keywords and description. I could find term "Titanium" among keywords and in description, but not "Stainless Steel". The other page does not have defined keywords and description, and annotation is good. > > Looks like when KIM finds keywords and description, it does not search the rest of the text. In this case, keywords and description are wrong. > Is this behavior "normal", and how can I make it search the rest of the text? > > Best regards, > Srecko Joksimovic > _______________________________________________ > Kim-discussion mailing list > Kim-discussion at ontotext.com > http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From borislav at sirma.bg Wed Sep 7 04:42:38 2011 From: borislav at sirma.bg (borislav popov) Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 11:42:38 +0300 Subject: [Kim-discussion] Cannot Start Kim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5D078C06-26E0-4CF7-AFBD-DC3F42E581F7@sirma.bg> Hello Mr. Perdoni, i have forwarded your support request to our kim-discussion mail list. It is obviously an issue related to the configuration of your Java > Cannot find javac resource bundle for locale en_US all the best borislav On Sep 7, 2011, at 2:00 AM, John Perdoni wrote: > Dear Sir/Madam > > I a trying to start kim via the config.bat sricpt but it is failing as shown below, not knowing that much about java i was wondering if you could point me in the right direction , I have tried the install on a windows 7 32 and 64bit > > Thanks in advance John > > C:\Users\John\Downloads\kim\bin>kim start > "KIM_MAX_JAVA_HEAP = 1g" > "JAVA_HOME = c:\Java\jdk1.7.0" > "KIM_HOME = C:\Users\John\Downloads\kim\bin\.." > [INFO] : : : : : : : : KIM SERVER START : : : : : : : : > [INFO] OwlimSchemaRepository: 3.3 > [INFO] Build date: 06-22-2010 11:57 > [INFO] Configured parameter 'imports' to 'kb/owl/owl.rdfs; > kb/owl/protons.owl; > kb/owl/protont.owl; > kb/owl/protonu.owl; > kb/owl/kimso.owl; > kb/owl/kimlo.owl; > kb/skos-owl1-dl.rdf; > kb/wkb.nt; > kb/wkbx.nt;' > [INFO] Configured parameter 'defaultNS' to 'http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#; > http://proton.semanticweb.org/2006/05/protons#; > http://proton.semanticweb.org/2006/05/protont#; > http://proton.semanticweb.org/2006/05/protonu#; > http://www.ontotext.com/kim/2006/05/wkb#; > http://www.ontotext.com/kim/2006/05/wkb#; > http://www.ontotext.com/kim/2006/05/wkb#; > http://www.ontotext.com/kim/2006/05/wkb#; > http://www.ontotext.com/kim/2006/05/wkb#;' > [INFO] Configured parameter 'base-URL' to 'http://www.ontotext.com/kim/2006/05/wkb#' > [INFO] Configured parameter 'ruleset' to 'kb/KIMRules.pie' > [INFO] Configured parameter 'ftsLiteralsOnly' to 'true' > [INFO] Configured parameter 'console-thread' to 'false' > [INFO] Configured parameter 'useShutdownHooks' to 'false' > [INFO] Configured parameter 'entity-index-size' to '400000' > [INFO] Configured parameter 'ftsIndexPolicy' to 'onStartup' > [INFO] Tokenization regular expression: [\p{L}\d_]+ > [INFO] Repository fragments: 1 > [INFO] Inferencer threads: 1 > [INFO] ftsPolicy = on-startup > [INFO] fts: indexing literals only > [INFO] Configured parameter 'tuple-index-memory' to '100M' > [INFO] Configured parameter 'fts-memory' to '80M' > [INFO] Cache pages for tuples: 5241 > [INFO] Cache pages for predicates: 0 > [INFO] Cache pages for FTS: 4193 > [INFO] Configured parameter 'storage-folder' to 'populated' > [INFO] Configured parameter 'repository-type' to 'file-repository' > [INFO] KIMService registered on port 1099 > Compiled: 'C:\Users\John\Downloads\kim\context\default\kb\KIMRules.pie' > Exception in thread "ComponentStarter-Thread-2" java.lang.InternalError: Cannot find javac resource bundle for locale en_US > at com.sun.tools.javac.util.JavacMessages.getBundles(JavacMessages.java:124) > at com.sun.tools.javac.util.JavacMessages.setCurrentLocale(JavacMessages.java:73) > at com.sun.tools.javac.util.JavacMessages.(JavacMessages.java:98) > at com.sun.tools.javac.util.JavacMessages.(JavacMessages.java:88) > at com.sun.tools.javac.main.Main.getLocalizedString(Main.java:562) > at com.sun.tools.javac.main.Main.bugMessage(Main.java:481) > at com.sun.tools.javac.main.Main.compile(Main.java:462) > at com.sun.tools.javac.api.JavacTaskImpl.call(JavacTaskImpl.java:132) > at com.ontotext.trree.rules.RuntimeInferencerCompiler.compileInferencer(RuntimeInferencerCompiler.java:109) > at com.ontotext.trree.OwlimSchemaRepository.initialize(OwlimSchemaRepository.java:501) > at org.openrdf.repository.sail.SailRepository.initialize(SailRepository.java:84) > at com.ontotext.kim.semanticrepository.UnmanagedRepositoryFactory.reconnect(UnmanagedRepositoryFactory.java:40) > at com.ontotext.kim.KIMServiceImpl.getSemanticRepositoryAPI(KIMServiceImpl.java:228) > at com.ontotext.kim.KIMServiceImpl.getSemanticRepositoryAPI(KIMServiceImpl.java:198) > at com.ontotext.kim.KIMServiceImpl$ServerComponentStarter.run(KIMServiceImpl.java:82) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From silvia at sirma.bg Fri Sep 9 10:57:45 2011 From: silvia at sirma.bg (Silvia Karagova) Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 17:57:45 +0300 Subject: [Kim-discussion] UPDATE: Semantic Technologies with OWLIM, 28-30 Sept., London Message-ID: <4E6A2969.7040509@sirma.bg> Dear OWLIM friends, There are only*6 days left to register* for Semantic Technologies with OWLIM*on regular price*.Normal registration finishes on the 16th of September - late registrations after this date incur a 30% surcharge (only 20% surcharge for students and partners).The number of attendants is limited, as the maximum course size is 12 and there are already several people registered. The *location is now fixed* - the course will take place at Institute of Education, University of London, on Russel Square, next door to the location of SemTech UK. Now, we also *accept credit card payments* (in USD) for registration. You can register at: https://www.ontotext.com/shop/Training-London-September. The Ontotext team -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sreckojoksimovic at gmail.com Fri Sep 9 12:52:17 2011 From: sreckojoksimovic at gmail.com (srecko joksimovic) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 18:52:17 +0200 Subject: [Kim-discussion] Keyword and description problem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Philip, I am sorry because I couldn't answer earlier. There is something else wrong in this case. I have to do some changes with the ontology. I did a few changes with gazetteer, JAPE rule, and few other things, and it works better now, but I still have few problems. But I think that is going to be much better when I fix my ontology. Best, Srecko On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Philip Alexiev @ Ontotext < philip.alexiev at ontotext.com> wrote: > Hi Srecko, > > I noticed that in the first document the term is mentioned as "Stainless > Steel" and in the second as "Stainless steel" and "stainless steel". My > guess is that you have a case sensitive gazetteer and the term is in it > either as "stainless steel" or "Stainless steel" . Is this the cse ? > > If not please send the pipeline if it is different from the standard KIM > pipeline, and also the part of the ontology that describes "Stainless steel" > . > > Thank you, > Philip Alexiev > Software Engineer, KIM team > > > On 2 Sep 2011, at 3:11 PM, srecko joksimovic wrote: > > Hello, > > I have configured KIM to annotate using my ontology. And that part works > fine. But, I have noticed a strange behavior. > > When I annotate this page: > > http://www.keytometals.com/page.aspx?ID=CheckArticle&LN=EN&site=KTS&NM=67 > > I never get term "Stainless Steel" (which is in ontology). But I get > titanium, and few more terms that should not be there. But, when I annotate > this page: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stainless_steel > > there is "Stainless Steel", among other terms. I checked pages, and what I > saw is that the first page has defined keywords and description. I could > find term "Titanium" among keywords and in description, but not "Stainless > Steel". The other page does not have defined keywords and description, and > annotation is good. > > Looks like when KIM finds keywords and description, it does not search the > rest of the text. In this case, keywords and description are wrong. > Is this behavior "normal", and how can I make it search the rest of the > text? > > Best regards, > Srecko Joksimovic > _______________________________________________ > Kim-discussion mailing list > Kim-discussion at ontotext.com > http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From borislav at sirma.bg Sun Sep 11 01:34:47 2011 From: borislav at sirma.bg (borislav popov) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 08:34:47 +0300 Subject: [Kim-discussion] Cannot Start Kim In-Reply-To: References: <5D078C06-26E0-4CF7-AFBD-DC3F42E581F7@sirma.bg> Message-ID: Dear John, the free support through a discussion list is not always very quick. Also this is more a Java configuration issue, than a specific Ontotext product one, but i am sure somebody will take the time to chase it. all the best borislav On Sep 10, 2011, at 3:16 AM, John Perdoni wrote: > Dear Borislav, > > I have been moinitoring the discussion list, but have yet to have any sort of reply, please could u chase thjs up for me. Thanks in advance > > John > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:42 AM, borislav popov wrote: > Hello Mr. Perdoni, > i have forwarded your support request to our kim-discussion mail list. > > It is obviously an issue related to the configuration of your Java >> Cannot find javac resource bundle for locale en_US > > all the best > borislav > > On Sep 7, 2011, at 2:00 AM, John Perdoni wrote: > >> Dear Sir/Madam >> >> I a trying to start kim via the config.bat sricpt but it is failing as shown below, not knowing that much about java i was wondering if you could point me in the right direction , I have tried the install on a windows 7 32 and 64bit >> >> Thanks in advance John >> >> C:\Users\John\Downloads\kim\bin>kim start >> "KIM_MAX_JAVA_HEAP = 1g" >> "JAVA_HOME = c:\Java\jdk1.7.0" >> "KIM_HOME = C:\Users\John\Downloads\kim\bin\.." >> [INFO] : : : : : : : : KIM SERVER START : : : : : : : : >> [INFO] OwlimSchemaRepository: 3.3 >> [INFO] Build date: 06-22-2010 11:57 >> [INFO] Configured parameter 'imports' to 'kb/owl/owl.rdfs; >> kb/owl/protons.owl; >> kb/owl/protont.owl; >> kb/owl/protonu.owl; >> kb/owl/kimso.owl; >> kb/owl/kimlo.owl; >> kb/skos-owl1-dl.rdf; >> kb/wkb.nt; >> kb/wkbx.nt;' >> [INFO] Configured parameter 'defaultNS' to 'http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#; >> http://proton.semanticweb.org/2006/05/protons#; >> http://proton.semanticweb.org/2006/05/protont#; >> http://proton.semanticweb.org/2006/05/protonu#; >> http://www.ontotext.com/kim/2006/05/wkb#; >> http://www.ontotext.com/kim/2006/05/wkb#; >> http://www.ontotext.com/kim/2006/05/wkb#; >> http://www.ontotext.com/kim/2006/05/wkb#; >> http://www.ontotext.com/kim/2006/05/wkb#;' >> [INFO] Configured parameter 'base-URL' to 'http://www.ontotext.com/kim/2006/05/wkb#' >> [INFO] Configured parameter 'ruleset' to 'kb/KIMRules.pie' >> [INFO] Configured parameter 'ftsLiteralsOnly' to 'true' >> [INFO] Configured parameter 'console-thread' to 'false' >> [INFO] Configured parameter 'useShutdownHooks' to 'false' >> [INFO] Configured parameter 'entity-index-size' to '400000' >> [INFO] Configured parameter 'ftsIndexPolicy' to 'onStartup' >> [INFO] Tokenization regular expression: [\p{L}\d_]+ >> [INFO] Repository fragments: 1 >> [INFO] Inferencer threads: 1 >> [INFO] ftsPolicy = on-startup >> [INFO] fts: indexing literals only >> [INFO] Configured parameter 'tuple-index-memory' to '100M' >> [INFO] Configured parameter 'fts-memory' to '80M' >> [INFO] Cache pages for tuples: 5241 >> [INFO] Cache pages for predicates: 0 >> [INFO] Cache pages for FTS: 4193 >> [INFO] Configured parameter 'storage-folder' to 'populated' >> [INFO] Configured parameter 'repository-type' to 'file-repository' >> [INFO] KIMService registered on port 1099 >> Compiled: 'C:\Users\John\Downloads\kim\context\default\kb\KIMRules.pie' >> Exception in thread "ComponentStarter-Thread-2" java.lang.InternalError: Cannot find javac resource bundle for locale en_US >> at com.sun.tools.javac.util.JavacMessages.getBundles(JavacMessages.java:124) >> at com.sun.tools.javac.util.JavacMessages.setCurrentLocale(JavacMessages.java:73) >> at com.sun.tools.javac.util.JavacMessages.(JavacMessages.java:98) >> at com.sun.tools.javac.util.JavacMessages.(JavacMessages.java:88) >> at com.sun.tools.javac.main.Main.getLocalizedString(Main.java:562) >> at com.sun.tools.javac.main.Main.bugMessage(Main.java:481) >> at com.sun.tools.javac.main.Main.compile(Main.java:462) >> at com.sun.tools.javac.api.JavacTaskImpl.call(JavacTaskImpl.java:132) >> at com.ontotext.trree.rules.RuntimeInferencerCompiler.compileInferencer(RuntimeInferencerCompiler.java:109) >> at com.ontotext.trree.OwlimSchemaRepository.initialize(OwlimSchemaRepository.java:501) >> at org.openrdf.repository.sail.SailRepository.initialize(SailRepository.java:84) >> at com.ontotext.kim.semanticrepository.UnmanagedRepositoryFactory.reconnect(UnmanagedRepositoryFactory.java:40) >> at com.ontotext.kim.KIMServiceImpl.getSemanticRepositoryAPI(KIMServiceImpl.java:228) >> at com.ontotext.kim.KIMServiceImpl.getSemanticRepositoryAPI(KIMServiceImpl.java:198) >> at com.ontotext.kim.KIMServiceImpl$ServerComponentStarter.run(KIMServiceImpl.java:82) > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From silvia at sirma.bg Wed Sep 14 11:38:27 2011 From: silvia at sirma.bg (Silvia Karagova) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 18:38:27 +0300 Subject: [Kim-discussion] =?utf-8?b?RndkOiBSZTogUsOpcC4gOiBSZTogS0lNIC0g?= =?utf-8?q?information?= Message-ID: <4E70CA73.8060302@sirma.bg> -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: R?p. : Re: KIM - information Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 18:36:00 +0300 From: Silvia Karagova To: Fabian Cretton , "KIM-discussion at ontotext.com" Hi, I am forwarding your question to the kim-discussion mailing list where you should get the best answer. Regards, Silvia --------------------------------- Silvia Karagova Ontotext ADhttp://www.ontotext.com Sirma Group Corp.http://www.sirma.bg Phone: +359 2 974 6160 Fax: +359 2 975 3226 On 14-Sep-11 13:58, Fabian Cretton wrote: > Dear Madam, > A few years ago, I contacted you to get some information about the KIM > platform (eMail here under). > Is it possible to know if nowaday new languages have been added ? > Especially French or Chinese ? > Thank you > Fabian Cretton > Fabian Cretton > Adjoint scientifique > Institut Informatique de gestion > HES-SO Valais Wallis > TechnoArk 3 > 3960 Sierre > Switzerland > T?l. : +41 27 / 606 90 12 > Fax : +41 27 / 606 90 00 > email : fabian.cretton at hevs.ch > www.hevs.ch , www.is-net.ch > > Plan d'acc?s : www.hevs.ch/GoTP > > > >>> "Silvia Karagova" 6/5/2009 5:15 >>> > Dear Mr. Cretton, > > Thank you very much for your interest! > > Up till now the KIM Platform is 'ready to use' only in English. There are > some KIM enthusiast groups from Vietnam and China who are working to > enable > the Platform on their native languages but this is not something we > support > for now. > > Please feel free to contact us if you have any further questions! > > Best regards, > Silvia > > > ----------------------------------- > Silvia Karagova > Ontotext AD http://www.ontotext.com > Sirma Group Corp. http://www.sirma.bg > Phone: +359 2 4901 575; +359 2 974 6160 > Fax: +359 2 975 3226 > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Fabian Cretton" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 10:29 AM > Subject: KIM - information > > > > Dear Sir, Madam, > > > > We are building a multi-lingual platform which will have to handle > > text-mining on french and chinese documents. The domain will be the > > 'computer science'. According to this, would a system like KIM be the > > ideal tool for us ? > > Would it be 'ready to use' in such a context ? > > > > If so, is it possible to have some information about the licence fees > > related to the KIM system ? > > > > This e-mail is more about getting information, as we are working on a > > research project that might lead to a commercial solution, but with > > little financial capacities so far. > > > > Thank you > > Fabian Cretton > > > > > > > > Fabian Cretton > > Assistant > > Institut Informatique de gestion > > HES-SO Valais Wallis > > TechnoArk 3 > > 3960 Sierre > > Switzerland > > > > T?l. : +41 27 / 606 90 12 > > Fax : +41 27 / 606 90 00 > > email : fabian.cretton at hevs.ch > > > > www.hevs.ch, www.is-net.ch > > > > Plan d'acc?s : www.hevs.ch/GoTP > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.49/2149 - Release Date: > 06/01/09 > 17:55:00 > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From borislav at sirma.bg Thu Sep 15 03:25:32 2011 From: borislav at sirma.bg (borislav popov) Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:25:32 +0300 Subject: [Kim-discussion] =?iso-8859-1?q?Fwd=3A_Re=3A_R=E9p=2E_=3A_Re=3A_K?= =?iso-8859-1?q?IM_-_information?= In-Reply-To: <4E70CA73.8060302@sirma.bg> References: <4E70CA73.8060302@sirma.bg> Message-ID: <00BE36F1-F0EC-406A-8A19-E425B2757CF7@sirma.bg> Dear Fabian, we do not provide any language specific packages off the shelf together with the KIM Platform. As the name points it is a platform and its text analysis capabilities are based on GATE - so any language specific plugin available for GATE is available also for the semantic annotation processes in KIM. Additionally, as tasks vary not only because of the language, but because of the domain of the texts and the focus of the extraction, we can provide machine learning extraction components trained on a corpus specific for your needs. All the best borislav On Sep 14, 2011, at 6:38 PM, Silvia Karagova wrote: > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: R?p. : Re: KIM - information > Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 18:36:00 +0300 > From: Silvia Karagova > To: Fabian Cretton , "KIM-discussion at ontotext.com" > > Hi, > > I am forwarding your question to the kim-discussion mailing list where you should get the best answer. > > Regards, > Silvia > > > --------------------------------- > Silvia Karagova > Ontotext AD http://www.ontotext.com > Sirma Group Corp. http://www.sirma.bg > Phone: +359 2 974 6160 > Fax: +359 2 975 3226 > > On 14-Sep-11 13:58, Fabian Cretton wrote: >> >> Dear Madam, >> >> A few years ago, I contacted you to get some information about the KIM platform (eMail here under). >> >> Is it possible to know if nowaday new languages have been added ? Especially French or Chinese ? >> >> Thank you >> Fabian Cretton >> >> Fabian Cretton >> Adjoint scientifique >> Institut Informatique de gestion >> HES-SO Valais Wallis >> TechnoArk 3 >> 3960 Sierre >> Switzerland >> >> T?l. : +41 27 / 606 90 12 >> Fax : +41 27 / 606 90 00 >> email : fabian.cretton at hevs.ch >> >> www.hevs.ch, www.is-net.ch >> >> Plan d'acc?s : www.hevs.ch/GoTP >> >> >> >>> "Silvia Karagova" 6/5/2009 5:15 >>> >> Dear Mr. Cretton, >> >> Thank you very much for your interest! >> >> Up till now the KIM Platform is 'ready to use' only in English. There are >> some KIM enthusiast groups from Vietnam and China who are working to enable >> the Platform on their native languages but this is not something we support >> for now. >> >> Please feel free to contact us if you have any further questions! >> >> Best regards, >> Silvia >> >> >> ----------------------------------- >> Silvia Karagova >> Ontotext AD http://www.ontotext.com >> Sirma Group Corp. http://www.sirma.bg >> Phone: +359 2 4901 575; +359 2 974 6160 >> Fax: +359 2 975 3226 >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Fabian Cretton" >> To: >> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 10:29 AM >> Subject: KIM - information >> >> >> > Dear Sir, Madam, >> > >> > We are building a multi-lingual platform which will have to handle >> > text-mining on french and chinese documents. The domain will be the >> > 'computer science'. According to this, would a system like KIM be the >> > ideal tool for us ? >> > Would it be 'ready to use' in such a context ? >> > >> > If so, is it possible to have some information about the licence fees >> > related to the KIM system ? >> > >> > This e-mail is more about getting information, as we are working on a >> > research project that might lead to a commercial solution, but with >> > little financial capacities so far. >> > >> > Thank you >> > Fabian Cretton >> > >> > >> > >> > Fabian Cretton >> > Assistant >> > Institut Informatique de gestion >> > HES-SO Valais Wallis >> > TechnoArk 3 >> > 3960 Sierre >> > Switzerland >> > >> > T?l. : +41 27 / 606 90 12 >> > Fax : +41 27 / 606 90 00 >> > email : fabian.cretton at hevs.ch >> > >> > www.hevs.ch, www.is-net.ch >> > >> > Plan d'acc?s : www.hevs.ch/GoTP >> > >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.49/2149 - Release Date: 06/01/09 >> 17:55:00 >> > _______________________________________________ > Kim-discussion mailing list > Kim-discussion at ontotext.com > http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From reneta.popova at ontotext.com Tue Sep 27 05:02:44 2011 From: reneta.popova at ontotext.com (Reneta Popova) Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:02:44 +0300 Subject: [Kim-discussion] Fwd: LKB Gazetter and Virtuoso References: Message-ID: <32E7C6F1-5C7B-4EC4-BE9E-08A66C34F89A@ontotext.com> Hello guys, It seems I am the only one who receives emails and requests about the LKB Gazetteer:) Best, Reni Begin forwarded message: > From: Maria Isabel Salinas > Subject: LKB Gazetter and Virtuoso > Date: 27 ????????? 2011 11:58:54 ????????+0300 > To: danko at ontotext.com, reneta.popova at ontotext.com, marin.nozhchev at ontotext.com > > Hello, > > > I am Isabel, from Madrid, > > I'm trying to use LKB Gazetteer with Virtuoso repository and I have a encountered a technical problem. > > I have configured it following > http://nmwiki.ontotext.com/lkb_gazetteer/general.html > > and I have tried some queries with success. > > Now I am trying another query and I am getting the following exception (however the query works perfectly in Virtuosos): > > > Caused by: com.ontotext.kim.client.query.KIMQueryException: Encountered " "(" "( "" at line 1, colum > n 8. > Was expecting one of: > > "*" ... > "using" ... > "namespace" ... > "from" ... > "label" ... > "lang" ... > "datatype" ... > "localname" ... > "str" ... > "null" ... > "union" ... > "minus" ... > "intersect" ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > Encountered "(" at line 1, column 8. > Was expecting one of: > "*" ... > ... > ... > > while running this query: > SELECT (bif:substring(STR(?s), 63, bif:length(str(?s)) ) AS ?nombre) ?s > FROM > WHERE {{?s rdf:type owl:NamedIndividual} FILTER (!isBlank(?s)) } > at com.ontotext.kim.util.datastore.RepositoryFeed.feedTo(RepositoryFeed.java:60) > at com.ontotext.kim.util.datastore.PrivateRepositoryFeed.feedTo(PrivateRepositoryFeed.java:9 > 7) > ... 278 more > > > > Can you help me with this? > Thank you very much in advance > > > Isabel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: